Comparison
Land Rover Range Rover or Volvo XC90?
On the open Nordic market, the Volvo XC90 is a median 23% cheaper than the Land Rover Range Rover (SEK 379,000 vs SEK 466,656, September 2026). Below we compare the two on price, price span, typical mileage, depreciation and supply — all from our price index.
In short
- Volvo XC90 is cheaper to buy
- Volvo XC90 holds its value best
- Volvo XC90 has the widest supply
| Metric | Land Rover Range Rover | Volvo XC90 |
|---|---|---|
| Median price | SEK 466,656 | SEK 379,000 |
| Price span (P5–P95) | SEK 89,593 – SEK 2,216,178 | SEK 50,000 – SEK 838,867 |
| Typical mileage | 14,500 mil | 17,132 mil |
| Depreciation / year | SEK 34,438 (7.4%/yr) | SEK 24,045 (6.3%/yr) |
| Supply in the Nordics | 250 cars | 811 cars |
| Days on market (median) | 38 days | 21 days |
Land Rover Range Rover
The data may be reused freely with attribution (CC BY 4.0): RarestMarket Premium Car Index. Methodology & sources →